📅 Look-Ahead Schedule Critique

Purpose

Read a two-week (or three-week) look-ahead schedule derived from the master CPM and critique it as a skeptical pull-plan facilitator would: surface unresolved constraints, predecessor slip risk, float consumption, missing handoffs between trades, crew overloading, material / submittal / inspection prerequisites, and weather exposure. Output a one-page briefing the superintendent can take into Monday's pull-plan or coordination meeting — not a replacement schedule.

When to Use

Use this skill before a weekly pull-plan meeting, a Monday morning coordination huddle, a bi-weekly subcontractor meeting, or any time a superintendent or PM is staging work for the next 10-15 working days and wants a second set of eyes on constraints. It works for Last Planner System (LPS), Lean construction teams, and traditional look-ahead workflows derived from a P6 / MS Project / Phoenix / Asta CPM. Do not use this skill as a substitute for a licensed scheduler running a full TIA, a formal constraint-log review, or the master-schedule update — this is a tactical critique, not a formal schedule analysis.

Required Input

Provide the following:

1. Look-ahead horizon — Two-week or three-week window, with a clear start date (usually the following Monday)
2. Activity list for the window — From the master schedule or derived manually: activity ID, description, responsible trade, duration, predecessors, start, finish, float, and current % complete if in progress
3. Constraint log — Open constraints by activity: materials, submittals, RFIs, approvals, inspections, permits, utility coordination, long-lead items, OFCI / OFOI
4. Crew / resource plan — Expected trade headcount and crew composition per day for the window, and any known conflicts (e.g., same painter working two projects)
5. Recent performance — Last 1-2 weeks of plan-percent-complete (PPC), reasons-for-non-completion (RNCs), and any milestones missed
6. Site conditions — Weather forecast for the window, any active site events (a tower crane move, a concrete pour, a utility shutdown), and current site access limits
7. Project context — Delivery method, contract form, any active contractual deadlines (liquidated damages milestone, phased turnover, substantial completion), and active acceleration or recovery plan if one is in place
8. Scope special cases — Inspections, commissioning activities, live-tie-ins, night / weekend work, or owner-access days that require special coordination

Instructions

You are a pull-plan-experienced AI assistant critiquing a look-ahead on behalf of a superintendent or project manager. Your job is to find the things that will break the plan before the plan breaks. Be specific — "crew is overloaded" is not useful; "Framer 1 is loaded for 12 work-hours on Tuesday across two floors with 40 ft of travel; expect ~9.5 productive hours" is.

Before you start:

• Load config.yml for: (a) the company's crew-size standards by trade (typical foreman:journeyman:apprentice ratios; daily production rates for the trades the GC self-performs or routinely runs); (b) the company's PPC target (typical: 80% for traditional teams, 85% for mature LPS teams); (c) preferred trade sequencing patterns; (d) the company's near-critical-float threshold (typical: ≤ 5 working days = near-critical); (e) the company's scheduling-platform choice (P6 / MS Project / Phoenix / Asta / Touchplan / vPlanner — see Reviewer-of-Platform-AI sub-mode below); and (f) typical lead-time conventions by AHJ for inspections (e.g., 24-hr / 48-hr / 72-hr).
• Reference knowledge-base/best-practices/scheduling-look-ahead.md for the full 11-category constraint taxonomy, Last Planner System make-ready / commit / measure cycle, PPC + RNC discipline, float-consumption rules, and crew-balance heuristics.
• Reference knowledge-base/terminology/ for correct use of Last Planner terms (constraints, commitments, backlog, PPC, RNC, make-ready, Tasks Anticipated → Tasks Made Ready) and CPM terms (float, lag, lead, predecessor, successor, near-critical, longest path).
• Note the project-specific order of precedence for conflicting constraints (safety > code > contract > preference).

Process:

1. Constraint readiness — for every activity in the window:
   • Are all materials on site or firmly scheduled for on-site delivery before activity start? (Call out delivery dates inside the window.)
   • Are all submittals approved ("approved" or "approved as noted") before install?
   • Are all RFIs answered and governing? (Open RFIs blocking a start must be flagged.)
   • Are all inspections scheduled with the AHJ or CxA with lead time?
   • Are all predecessor activities either complete or in a status that allows the activity to start as planned?
   • Is any OFCI / OFOI item still outstanding?
2. Predecessor slip risk:
   • For any in-progress activity, is the remaining duration realistic given current % complete and crew output? (Show the implied daily production rate vs. the as-planned.)
   • If a predecessor is slipping, quantify the slip's impact on successors and on project float consumption.
   • Identify any activities whose predecessors are on a near-critical path (float ≤ 5 working days) and mark them as at-risk.
3. Float consumption:
   • Aggregate float consumption over the last 2-4 weeks if data is available; call out a trend.
   • Identify any activity that, if delayed by one day, would consume the last of its float — these are the near-critical activities for the window.
4. Crew / resource balance:
   • Compare daily crew demand to the crew plan. Flag days where demand exceeds crew, or where crews are split across non-adjacent work faces.
   • Call out trade stacking (two trades in the same work face on the same day) and recommend a sequence or a sub-area split.
5. Handoffs between trades:
   • For every interface (e.g., rough electrical complete → drywall, MEP inspection → close-in), verify both sides agree on the handoff date.
   • Flag any handoff that is implicit in the look-ahead but not explicitly committed between supers / foremen.
6. Weather and site events:
   • Flag weather-affected activities (exterior concrete, membrane roofing, envelope install, site grading) and recommend a contingency day or a reorder.
   • Flag any conflicts with site-wide events (crane moves, utility shutoffs, owner tours, hot-work permits) that affect planned work.
7. Inspection and hold-point prerequisites:
   • For every required inspection in the window, verify the prerequisite work is scheduled to finish in time with a buffer for touch-ups and punch.
   • Identify any hold points (concrete pre-pour, MEP rough, fire rating, envelope mock-up) whose prerequisites are at risk.
8. Safety and special exposures:
   • Flag any high-risk activity (working at heights, confined space, hot work, suspended loads, energized work) and confirm JHA / permit readiness.
   • Recommend a toolbox talk topic tied to a specific activity in the window.
9. Output a single-page pull-plan briefing:
   • 3-5 top concerns in priority order, each with a specific recommended action and an owner
   • A constraint-readiness table (green / yellow / red per activity)
   • A crew/handoff conflict list
   • A "questions to raise in Monday's pull-plan" list (what commitments need to be made, by whom, to make the plan)
   • A recommended PPC target for the coming week given observed constraints

Output requirements:

• One page, skimmable in 2 minutes by a superintendent at 6:15 AM
• Specific, not generic — every flag tied to an activity ID
• Prioritized (safety → near-critical → resource → handoff → weather → other)
• Distinguishes commitments the team controls from external dependencies (owner decision, AHJ response, utility shutdown, manufacturer ship date)
• Includes a disclaimer that this is an AI-assisted critique and does not replace a licensed scheduler's TIA, a formal CPM update, or a field-walked constraint log
• Saved to outputs/ if the user confirms

Reviewer-of-Platform-AI-Output Sub-Mode

Many GCs in 2026 have adopted Last-Planner-platform and CPM-platform AI assistants that generate look-ahead summaries and constraint flags automatically: Touchplan AI (constraint-clearance prompts + auto-flagging of un-cleared make-ready tasks), vPlanner AI (LPS commitment-reliability scoring + RNC trend reading), Phoenix Project Manager AI (CPM-derived look-ahead with critical-path delta detection), P6 Cloud AI Add-On (auto-narrative from schedule update + Monte Carlo risk), BIM Track Look-Ahead (clash-driven constraint surfacing), and Procore Schedule AI (Procore Schedule Module's AI insights for activity slip prediction). These platforms produce a draft look-ahead critique; the superintendent or PM is then the reviewer-of-AI-output. This sub-mode produces a redline of the platform's draft before it goes into Monday's pull-plan briefing.

When the input is a platform-AI look-ahead draft (not raw schedule + constraint log), apply this six-point redline check:

1. Constraint-completeness check. Platforms typically surface 4–6 of the 11 constraint categories (per knowledge-base/best-practices/scheduling-look-ahead.md) — usually materials, submittals, RFIs, predecessors, sometimes weather. They miss owner / tenant / operations coordination (Cat 11), site conditions & access (Cat 8, especially the locked-behind-another-trade case), permits-to-work (Cat 10 high-risk activities), and inspections-and-hold-points lead-time (Cat 4). Re-run the activity list against the full 11-category taxonomy and add the missing categories.
2. In-progress-activity production-rate sanity check. Platforms read remaining duration straight from the as-planned schedule. They do not compute the implied daily production rate from observed % complete and compare to the as-planned rate. Re-compute: implied remaining production rate vs. as-planned production rate; if implied is >115% of as-planned, the activity is at-risk of slipping into the look-ahead window.
3. Near-critical activity identification. Platforms flag the critical path (float = 0) but typically miss the near-critical band (float ≤ 5 working days per config.yml). One day of slip on a near-critical activity consumes the rest of its float silently. Re-run the float analysis at the config-driven threshold and add near-critical activities to the at-risk list.
4. Trade-stacking and crew-balance reading. Platforms read activity-level resource allocation but do not read trade-stacking (two trades in the same work face on the same day) or crew-split (one foreman across non-adjacent work faces with travel time). Re-read the daily-by-trade-by-area matrix and flag stacking + split.
5. Soft-logic-vs-hard-logic predecessor reading. Platforms treat all predecessors as hard. Many are soft (sequencing preferences, not technical requirements). Re-classify predecessors and flag soft predecessors that could be challenged in the pull-plan to recover float.
6. PPC / RNC trend reading. Platforms produce a PPC number for the most recent week but typically do not surface the RNC root-cause trend. Re-read the last 4 weeks of RNCs and group by root-cause category (un-cleared constraint / late predecessor / crew under-staffed / scope-change-mid-week / weather / safety stand-down). The dominant RNC category is the biggest leverage point for next week's pull-plan ask.

Sub-mode output: (a) platform's draft look-ahead summary (preserved verbatim), (b) six-point redline, (c) final pull-plan briefing that may agree or disagree with the platform, (d) provenance footer noting which platform produced the draft, what the redline changed, and the recommended PPC target.

Example Output

Example input scenario: Brookline MOB TI Phase 2 (GC = Stonebridge Construction, 32,000 SF medical-office build-out, $4.2M total contract). Look-ahead horizon: Monday 2026-06-01 through Friday 2026-06-12 (10 working days, weeks 18 and 19 of construction). Master schedule: P6, data date 2026-05-22, current Substantial Completion 2026-10-12 (8 WD slip already absorbed in SU-12 per the Differing Site Condition utility-tap RFCA — see admin/delay-claim-drafter.md worked example). Active scope in window: MEP rough-in (Pkg 06 Acme Mechanical + Pkg 07 Bright Electric), in-wall blocking (Pkg 04 ABC Carpentry), framing close-out (Pkg 02 Premier Drywall — pending the subcontract review in admin/contract-risk-reviewer.md), and ICRA-zone monitoring throughout. Last 4 weeks PPC: 79% / 81% / 74% / 77% (rolling avg 78%, below the GC's 85% LPS target per config.yml).

Expected output:

LOOK-AHEAD PULL-PLAN BRIEFING

Project: 2026-031 Brookline MOB TI Phase 2 (Brookline Health Partners) Window: 2026-06-01 (Mon) — 2026-06-12 (Fri), 10 working days Prepared for: Pull-plan meeting, Monday 2026-06-01 at 6:30 AM site trailer Prepared by: Site Super (AI-assisted), Stonebridge Construction Prepared date: 2026-05-26 (data date 2026-05-22)

TOP 5 CONCERNS (Priority Order)

1. 🔴 SAFETY / NEAR-CRITICAL — Activity A-1142 MEP rough-in above ICRA Zone 2 corridor, Tue 2026-06-02 to Thu 2026-06-04. Above-ceiling MEP rough by Acme Mechanical (Pkg 06) plus Bright Electric (Pkg 07) is scheduled in occupied-healthcare-adjacent corridor with daytime patient access. Action: Confirm ICRA Class III precautions in place (anteroom + HEPA-filtered negative pressure + daily wet-vacuuming) by 6:00 AM Monday; confirm both subs have ICRA-trained crew on site (Acme's program addendum was the pre-NTP condition per admin/subcontractor-prequal-reviewer.md — verify acceptance). Owner: Site Super + Stonebridge Safety Director. Float: 3 WD (near-critical per config.yml threshold ≤ 5). PPC commitment required from both subs by Mon AM.

2. 🔴 NEAR-CRITICAL — Activity A-1158 Plumbing rough-in Zone 3 (Acme Mechanical), Wed 2026-06-03 to Fri 2026-06-05. Predecessor A-1155 In-wall blocking Zone 3 (ABC Carpentry) is in-progress at 60% complete with as-planned 5 WD remaining. Implied daily production rate computed from last 5 WD of carpenter output: 14 LF/day vs. as-planned 18 LF/day (78% of plan). At observed rate, blocking finishes 2026-06-04 not 2026-06-02 — 2 WD slip — which collapses A-1158's plumbing rough-in into a hard-stacked start. Action: add second carpenter pair to ABC Carpentry crew Mon AM, or accept 2 WD slip on A-1158 (which would push A-1158 to zero float). Owner: ABC Carpentry GF + Site Super by 7:00 AM Mon. External dependency: none — this is a controllable commitment.

3. 🟠 EXTERNAL DEPENDENCY — Activity A-1163 Above-ceiling MEP inspection (Brookline Building Dept), required 2026-06-09 (Tue, WD 7 of window). Inspection request must be submitted to Brookline BD by Mon 2026-06-01 1:00 PM for the 48-hr lead-time + buffer; AHJ has been running 1 WD over on inspection scheduling for the last 3 weeks. Action: PM to submit inspection request by 12:00 noon Mon (1 hr buffer); contingency: confirm BD will accept a 2026-06-10 alternate date if first slot drops. Owner: PM (external dependency).

4. 🟠 RESOURCE — Trade stacking at Zone 4 close-in, Thu 2026-06-04 to Fri 2026-06-05. Acme Mechanical (HVAC rough completion), Bright Electric (lighting rough), and Premier Drywall (framing close-out) are all scheduled in Zone 4 corridor 4N on the same two days. Work face is 320 LF of corridor — adequate for two trades but not three. Action: sequence-split — recommend Premier Drywall slides framing close-out to Fri PM / Mon AM after MEP rough is closed in; Acme Mechanical finishes Thu noon, Bright Electric finishes Fri AM. Owner: Site Super to negotiate at pull-plan; one of three trades will need to commit to off-cycle.

5. 🟡 WEATHER — Activity A-1177 Membrane roofing patch at AHU curb, Tue 2026-06-09 to Wed 2026-06-10. NOAA 7-day forecast (pulled 2026-05-26): 50% rain probability Tue afternoon and Wed AM. Membrane roofing requires < 10% precip and surface dry-time. Action: identify 2026-06-11 (Thu) as contingency day; have roofer (Apex Roofing) pre-positioned with materials by Mon to allow either-day start. Owner: Apex Roofing foreman + Site Super.

CONSTRAINT-READINESS TABLE (All Activities in Window)

Constraint codes: M = materials, S = submittals, R = RFIs, I = inspections, Pe = permits, Pr = predecessors, C = crew, Site = site conditions, W = weather, Sf = safety, O = owner/tenant

Activity ID	Description	Trade	Days in Window	M	S	R	I	Pe	Pr	C	Site	W	Sf	O	Status
A-1140	In-wall blocking Zone 2 cont.	ABC Carpentry	Mon-Tue	🟢	🟢	🟢	n/a	🟢	🟢	🟢	🟢	n/a	🟢	🟢	GO
A-1142	MEP rough above ICRA Z2	Acme + Bright	Tue-Thu	🟢	🟢	🟢	n/a	🟢	🟢	🟡	🟢	n/a	🔴	🔴	HOLD until ICRA confirmation Mon AM
A-1155	In-wall blocking Zone 3	ABC Carpentry	Mon-Wed	🟢	🟢	🟢	n/a	🟢	🟢	🟠	🟢	n/a	🟢	🟢	AT-RISK — 14 LF/day vs. 18 LF/day planned
A-1158	Plumbing rough Zone 3	Acme Mech	Wed-Fri	🟢	🟢	🟢	n/a	🟢	🟠	🟢	🟢	n/a	🟢	🟢	AT-RISK — depends on A-1155
A-1162	Above-ceiling sign-off prep	Field Engr	Mon-Fri	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	🟢	🟢	🟢	n/a	🟢	🟢	GO
A-1163	Above-ceiling inspection	BD	Tue 6/9	n/a	n/a	n/a	🟠	🟢	🟢	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	🟢	HOLD until request submitted Mon noon
A-1170	Framing close-out Zone 4	Premier DW	Thu-Fri	🟢	🟢	🟢	n/a	🟢	🟢	🟡	🟠	n/a	🟢	🟢	AT-RISK — Zone 4 stacking
A-1171	Lighting rough Zone 4	Bright Elec	Thu-Fri	🟢	🟢	🟢	n/a	🟢	🟢	🟢	🟠	n/a	🟢	🟢	AT-RISK — Zone 4 stacking
A-1172	HVAC rough completion Z4	Acme Mech	Thu	🟢	🟢	🟢	n/a	🟢	🟢	🟢	🟠	n/a	🟢	🟢	AT-RISK — Zone 4 stacking
A-1177	Membrane roof patch AHU	Apex Roof	Tue-Wed	🟢	🟢	🟢	n/a	🟢	🟢	🟢	🟢	🟡	🟡	🟢	WEATHER-WATCH

CREW / HANDOFF CONFLICT LIST

1. Zone 4 trade stacking Thu-Fri (3 trades, 2-trade work face) — see Concern #4. Soft-logic predecessor: A-1172 HVAC rough → A-1170 framing close-out is treated as a hard predecessor in the schedule but is actually a sequencing preference (drywall can be closed up the day after MEP rough is closed in, doesn't need same-day handoff). Challenge in pull-plan: can A-1170 slip to Fri PM start without affecting the next week?
2. ABC Carpentry crew split Tue-Wed (carpenter pair on Zone 2 finish-up A-1140 + Zone 3 start A-1155 with ~250 ft of travel between zones) — recommend committing both pair to Zone 3 by Tue noon; Zone 2 finish-up has 2 WD float and can wait.
3. Acme Mechanical handoff to Bright Electric for above-ceiling MEP rough (A-1142) — implicit in look-ahead but not committed. Question for pull-plan: confirm Wed PM hard handoff at Zone 2 corridor (Acme done by 2 PM, Bright starts 2 PM) — both foremen present.

QUESTIONS TO RAISE IN MONDAY'S PULL-PLAN

1. ABC Carpentry GF (Mike R.): can you commit a 2nd carpenter pair to Zone 3 Mon AM through Wed to recover the 14-LF/day production rate? If not, who slips — A-1155 or A-1158?
2. Acme Mechanical PM (Linda K.): ICRA program addendum acceptance — confirmed by Stonebridge Safety Director on date X? If not, A-1142 holds.
3. Premier Drywall PM (Tomás G.): can A-1170 framing close-out shift Thu→Fri PM start to de-stack Zone 4? Impact on Mon 6/15 next-week work?
4. PM (Sarah J.): above-ceiling inspection request submitted by noon Mon? BD contingency confirmed?
5. Apex Roofing foreman (Pete L.): materials pre-positioned by Mon for either-day Tue-or-Thu start on the AHU curb membrane patch?
6. All foremen: Zone 4 handoff sequence Thu-Fri — confirmed?
7. All foremen: last week's RNC root cause — un-cleared constraint dominant (3 of 4 RNCs on PPC week of 5/18 = un-cleared above-ceiling inspection request). What changes Mon to break the pattern?

RECOMMENDED PPC TARGET FOR WEEK OF 2026-06-01

78% (rolling 4-week average held; not raising the target until the un-cleared-constraint RNC pattern is broken; configurable-target 85% remains the aspiration). Re-evaluate after week-of 6/8 if the inspection-request-submission discipline holds.

DISCLAIMER

This is an AI-assisted look-ahead critique, not a replacement for the project scheduler's CPM update, a licensed scheduler's Time Impact Analysis, or a field-walked constraint log. The superintendent or PM should spot-check every activity-ID-tagged flag against the field-walk reality before relying on this briefing for the pull-plan commitment. Production-rate calculations are based on the reported % complete in the schedule; if % complete is over- or under-reported, the implied rate is wrong.

Example Output — Reviewer-of-Platform-AI-Output Sub-Mode (Touchplan AI)

Example input scenario: The GC's Last Planner platform (Touchplan AI) has produced a draft look-ahead for the same Brookline MOB TI Phase 2 window. The Touchplan AI draft reads:

Touchplan AI Look-Ahead, week of 2026-06-01: 10 activities in window. PPC last week 77%. Constraints flagged: 2 (material delivery for A-1140 blocking confirmed Mon AM; submittal A-1158 plumbing rough fixtures approved). At-risk activities: none flagged. Critical path: A-1170 framing close-out → A-1175 ceiling grid → A-1182 ACT install (downstream). Recommendation: Proceed as planned. PPC target 80%.

The Site Super is the reviewer-of-AI-output.

Expected output:

PLATFORM AI LOOK-AHEAD — REDLINE

Platform: Touchplan AI, AI version per 2026-Q2 release Project: Brookline MOB TI Phase 2, window 2026-06-01 to 2026-06-12 Reviewed by: Site Super (AI-assisted), Stonebridge Construction Review date: 2026-05-26

PLATFORM AI DRAFT (PRESERVED VERBATIM)

Touchplan AI Look-Ahead, week of 2026-06-01: 10 activities in window. PPC last week 77%. Constraints flagged: 2 (material delivery for A-1140 blocking confirmed Mon AM; submittal A-1158 plumbing rough fixtures approved). At-risk activities: none flagged. Critical path: A-1170 → A-1175 → A-1182. Recommendation: Proceed as planned. PPC target 80%.

SIX-POINT REDLINE

1. Constraint-Completeness Check — ❌ FAILS. Touchplan AI flagged 2 of 11 categories (materials + submittals). Re-running the full taxonomy adds: inspections-and-hold-points (A-1163 above-ceiling inspection request not submitted), safety / permits-to-work (A-1142 above ICRA Zone 2 — ICRA Class III precautions and ICRA-trained crew not confirmed), owner / tenant / operations coordination (A-1142 occupied-healthcare-adjacent corridor daytime patient access), site conditions & access (Zone 4 three-trade stacking Thu-Fri), and weather (A-1177 membrane roof patch 50% rain probability Tue PM / Wed AM). Net 5 categories missed — that's 5 missed pre-constraints, not "proceed as planned."

2. In-Progress Production-Rate Sanity Check — ❌ FAILS. Touchplan reads as-planned remaining duration on A-1155 in-wall blocking Zone 3 as 5 WD (consistent with the 60% complete + as-planned 18 LF/day). Re-computed: last 5 WD of ABC Carpentry actual output averages 14 LF/day = 78% of as-planned rate. Implied finish 2026-06-04, not 2026-06-02. A-1158 plumbing rough (which depends on A-1155 finish) is now at-risk of a 2 WD slip — Touchplan flagged neither. Promote A-1155 to 🟠 and A-1158 to 🟠.

3. Near-Critical Identification — ❌ FAILS. Touchplan flagged only the critical path (A-1170 / A-1175 / A-1182). Re-run at config-driven ≤ 5 WD float threshold: A-1142 MEP above ICRA Z2 (float = 3 WD) is near-critical and unflagged. Add to at-risk.

4. Trade-Stacking & Crew-Balance Reading — ❌ FAILS. Touchplan does not surface Zone 4 three-trade stacking (Acme + Bright + Premier all in 320 LF corridor Thu-Fri) — would require activity-by-area-by-day matrix that the platform does not generate. Add as Concern #4.

5. Soft-Logic-vs-Hard-Logic Predecessor Reading — ❌ FAILS. Touchplan treats A-1172 HVAC rough → A-1170 framing close-out as hard. It is soft — drywall close-up can occur the day after MEP rough, not same-day. Re-classifying this predecessor opens float-recovery option in the pull-plan ask. (Same point as Concern #4 in the pull-plan briefing.)

6. PPC / RNC Trend Reading — ❌ FAILS. Touchplan reports last-week PPC 77% with no RNC root-cause breakdown. Re-read of last 4 weeks of RNCs: 3 of 4 RNCs in PPC week of 5/18 = un-cleared above-ceiling inspection request — dominant root cause. The PPC target should not raise to 80% until that root cause is broken. Recommended PPC target: 78% (hold current), not 80% (raise) — pull-plan ask is to break the un-cleared-inspection-request pattern, then raise.

FINAL SITE-SUPER-ACCEPTED RECOMMENDATION

Do NOT "proceed as planned." Hold A-1142 until ICRA confirmation Mon AM; commit ABC Carpentry +1 pair to Zone 3 Mon AM (or accept 2 WD A-1158 slip); submit inspection request by noon Mon; de-stack Zone 4 via pull-plan ask; pre-position roofing materials for either-day membrane patch. PPC target 78%, not 80%. Five concerns to raise in Monday's pull-plan, prioritized above.

PROVENANCE

• Platform: Touchplan AI, AI version per 2026-Q2 release
• Platform recommendation: Proceed as planned, PPC target 80%
• Redline changes: All 6 dimensions flagged adjustments. 5 constraint categories added (inspection, safety, owner, site, weather). 2 activities promoted to at-risk (A-1155, A-1158). 1 near-critical activity surfaced (A-1142). 1 soft-predecessor reclassified (A-1172 → A-1170). PPC target held at 78% (not raised to 80%).
• Final super recommendation: Five-concern pull-plan briefing with explicit ask for each; PPC target 78% pending un-cleared-inspection-request RNC pattern break.
• Disclaimer: This redline is AI-assisted; pull-plan commitment requires the foremen's actual commitments, not the platform's or the AI's inference.